- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Salvio giuliano 16:48, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Muhammad Nagar ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
While this is a real place, I don't see what makes it notable. Plus, it's just one long paragraph that isn't correct in it's grammar. I like Astatine ( Talk to me) 15:51, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 17:00, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:44, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep it seems to be a council which would likely qualify as legally-recognized. Crouch, Swale ( talk) 18:40, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:GEOLAND. Phil Bridger ( talk) 09:34, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
- KEEP The above article is much improved now. Unsourced content and 'original research' has been removed by me. It's not a long pargraph any more. Meets
WP:GEOLAND which states,
"Populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable".
Also meets WP:NPLACE which states,"Cities and villages are generally kept, regardless of size, as long as their existence is verified through a reliable source".
This article already has an archived reliable source by the National Reconstruction Bureau, Government of Pakistan website.... Ngrewal1 ( talk) 18:12, 17 February 2023 (UTC) - Keep per above comment. M.Ashraf333 ( talk) 06:49, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:GEOLAND. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 11:10, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Salvio giuliano 16:48, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Muhammad Nagar ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
While this is a real place, I don't see what makes it notable. Plus, it's just one long paragraph that isn't correct in it's grammar. I like Astatine ( Talk to me) 15:51, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 17:00, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:44, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep it seems to be a council which would likely qualify as legally-recognized. Crouch, Swale ( talk) 18:40, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:GEOLAND. Phil Bridger ( talk) 09:34, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
- KEEP The above article is much improved now. Unsourced content and 'original research' has been removed by me. It's not a long pargraph any more. Meets
WP:GEOLAND which states,
"Populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable".
Also meets WP:NPLACE which states,"Cities and villages are generally kept, regardless of size, as long as their existence is verified through a reliable source".
This article already has an archived reliable source by the National Reconstruction Bureau, Government of Pakistan website.... Ngrewal1 ( talk) 18:12, 17 February 2023 (UTC) - Keep per above comment. M.Ashraf333 ( talk) 06:49, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:GEOLAND. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 11:10, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.