The result was keep; the argument and sources provided by User:JavaTenor are convincing. Having swung the discussion, perhaps JT will be so kind as to add them to the article?-- Kubigula ( talk) 05:58, 30 November 2007 (UTC) reply
A local coffee shop that I don't quite think passes WP:CORP standards. It's notability is argued through being called the best coffee in the city by several reputable sources. So does having a few people call you the best cup of coffee equal notable per Wikipedia standards? I lean towards no. If this is kept, those sources need to be cleaned up; cite the independent sources and not the store's website. Metros ( talk) 21:35, 24 November 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep; the argument and sources provided by User:JavaTenor are convincing. Having swung the discussion, perhaps JT will be so kind as to add them to the article?-- Kubigula ( talk) 05:58, 30 November 2007 (UTC) reply
A local coffee shop that I don't quite think passes WP:CORP standards. It's notability is argued through being called the best coffee in the city by several reputable sources. So does having a few people call you the best cup of coffee equal notable per Wikipedia standards? I lean towards no. If this is kept, those sources need to be cleaned up; cite the independent sources and not the store's website. Metros ( talk) 21:35, 24 November 2007 (UTC) reply