The result was DELETE. postdlf ( talk) 23:22, 20 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Article fails WP:NOTABILITY, WP:BIO. Article is a fake name of a person or some pen name of a non-notable self-proclaimed author. Was strangly prodded by the author him/herself as "unreliable references and self-promotion", which seem accurate as it contains nothing more than blatently unreliable references and self-promotional press releases and, trivial incidental coverage. Hu12 ( talk) 15:44, 7 April 2011 (UTC) reply
I think that the Wikipedia community is going in the wrong direction when we become the non-notable "police". This author whether he chooses to reveal him true name or not has the largest following in the "dating advice for men" community. This is documented by a reliable source - Alexa.com. You have other writers in this community such as Ross Jeffries and Mystery The Pick Up Artist who have lesser websites with not nearly as many followers - which can also be easily documented by Alexa.com - who are allowed to be on the pages of Wikipedia because they have what? - Names and outside references?
What is notable if documented large numbers of people reading the writings of an author is not notable. Wikipedia needs to update its rules to be consistent with what "notability" REALLY is in a modern internet age society. We cannot exclude those who have documented large internet followings from the definition of "notable." Okko50 ( talk) 16:15, 13 April 2011 (UTC) Okko50 reply
The result was DELETE. postdlf ( talk) 23:22, 20 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Article fails WP:NOTABILITY, WP:BIO. Article is a fake name of a person or some pen name of a non-notable self-proclaimed author. Was strangly prodded by the author him/herself as "unreliable references and self-promotion", which seem accurate as it contains nothing more than blatently unreliable references and self-promotional press releases and, trivial incidental coverage. Hu12 ( talk) 15:44, 7 April 2011 (UTC) reply
I think that the Wikipedia community is going in the wrong direction when we become the non-notable "police". This author whether he chooses to reveal him true name or not has the largest following in the "dating advice for men" community. This is documented by a reliable source - Alexa.com. You have other writers in this community such as Ross Jeffries and Mystery The Pick Up Artist who have lesser websites with not nearly as many followers - which can also be easily documented by Alexa.com - who are allowed to be on the pages of Wikipedia because they have what? - Names and outside references?
What is notable if documented large numbers of people reading the writings of an author is not notable. Wikipedia needs to update its rules to be consistent with what "notability" REALLY is in a modern internet age society. We cannot exclude those who have documented large internet followings from the definition of "notable." Okko50 ( talk) 16:15, 13 April 2011 (UTC) Okko50 reply