From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. No new contributors since relist, but in the meantime the wikiproject guidance formerly at WP:WikiProject Classical music/Guidelines#Notability of recordings has been rescinded, and the review information provided previously indicates that WP:NALBUM is met. RL0919 ( talk) 00:07, 4 October 2019 (UTC) reply

Mozart Mass K. 139 (Claudio Abbado recording)

Mozart Mass K. 139 (Claudio Abbado recording) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails all of the criteria of WP:WikiProject Classical music/Guidelines#Notability of recordings. -- Softlavender ( talk) 20:38, 18 September 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 20:38, 18 September 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. note that it also fails WP:NALBUM and WP:COPYVIO. The main bulk of the article consists of long paraphrases of critics reviews - these are certainly violations of copyright. Smerus ( talk) 07:08, 19 September 2019 (UTC) reply

Comment. The criteria in WP:WikiProject Classical music/Guidelines#Notability of recordings is from an essay by a WikiProject and does not carry the broad support of wikipedia policy. Further, this guideline section is currently being considered for removal for WP:NPOV concerns, as well as its conflict with the policy at WP:NALBUM. 4meter4 ( talk) 01:30, 20 September 2019 (UTC) reply

  • Keep per WP:NALBUM. The article's COPYVIO issue has been addressed - brief review excerpts will be supplied in due course. For further coverage, please see Hi-Fi News & Record Review, Vol. 122, Issues 1-6, 1977, p. 4; Fanfare, Vol. 5, Issues 1-3, 1981, p. 204; American Record Guide, Vol. 40, Issues 8-11, 1977, p. 20; La Civiltà cattolica, Issues 3163-3168, 1982, p. 208; The New Records, Vol. 44-45, 1976, p. 65; The Penguin Guide to Compact Discs, 1999, p. 906. Niggle1892 ( talk) 16:36, 22 September 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Keep per criteria 1 of WP:NALBUM. The work was reviewed in multiple publications, including: Gramophone (see here); The Choral Journal (professional journal of the American Choral Directors Association) "A Select Annotated Discography of the Choral Works of Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart", April 1991, ([see here); Records and Recording: Classical Guide, Ateş Orga, Josephine Orga, Midas Books, 1978, page 302; and High Fidelity, Volume 23, 1978, Page 237. 4meter4 ( talk) 18:29, 22 September 2019 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 23:55, 26 September 2019 (UTC) reply

Comment I think the multiplicity of reviews is enough to prove notability. Niggle1892 ( talk) 02:43, 27 September 2019 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. No new contributors since relist, but in the meantime the wikiproject guidance formerly at WP:WikiProject Classical music/Guidelines#Notability of recordings has been rescinded, and the review information provided previously indicates that WP:NALBUM is met. RL0919 ( talk) 00:07, 4 October 2019 (UTC) reply

Mozart Mass K. 139 (Claudio Abbado recording)

Mozart Mass K. 139 (Claudio Abbado recording) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails all of the criteria of WP:WikiProject Classical music/Guidelines#Notability of recordings. -- Softlavender ( talk) 20:38, 18 September 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 20:38, 18 September 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. note that it also fails WP:NALBUM and WP:COPYVIO. The main bulk of the article consists of long paraphrases of critics reviews - these are certainly violations of copyright. Smerus ( talk) 07:08, 19 September 2019 (UTC) reply

Comment. The criteria in WP:WikiProject Classical music/Guidelines#Notability of recordings is from an essay by a WikiProject and does not carry the broad support of wikipedia policy. Further, this guideline section is currently being considered for removal for WP:NPOV concerns, as well as its conflict with the policy at WP:NALBUM. 4meter4 ( talk) 01:30, 20 September 2019 (UTC) reply

  • Keep per WP:NALBUM. The article's COPYVIO issue has been addressed - brief review excerpts will be supplied in due course. For further coverage, please see Hi-Fi News & Record Review, Vol. 122, Issues 1-6, 1977, p. 4; Fanfare, Vol. 5, Issues 1-3, 1981, p. 204; American Record Guide, Vol. 40, Issues 8-11, 1977, p. 20; La Civiltà cattolica, Issues 3163-3168, 1982, p. 208; The New Records, Vol. 44-45, 1976, p. 65; The Penguin Guide to Compact Discs, 1999, p. 906. Niggle1892 ( talk) 16:36, 22 September 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Keep per criteria 1 of WP:NALBUM. The work was reviewed in multiple publications, including: Gramophone (see here); The Choral Journal (professional journal of the American Choral Directors Association) "A Select Annotated Discography of the Choral Works of Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart", April 1991, ([see here); Records and Recording: Classical Guide, Ateş Orga, Josephine Orga, Midas Books, 1978, page 302; and High Fidelity, Volume 23, 1978, Page 237. 4meter4 ( talk) 18:29, 22 September 2019 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 23:55, 26 September 2019 (UTC) reply

Comment I think the multiplicity of reviews is enough to prove notability. Niggle1892 ( talk) 02:43, 27 September 2019 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook