The result was keep...again. *sigh* - Mailer Diablo 16:48, 24 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Procedural nom. It was placed by 72.255.99.114 who could not create a new page with the reason this is simply a long partisan editorial and inappropriate in an encylopedia. Previous AfD is here -- Wafulz 02:45, 19 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The only reason I could think of to delete this article is its probable POV statements. But that's something needs to be worked on, not a reason to delete the article. AQu01rius ( User | Talk | Websites) 03:28, 19 October 2006 (UTC) reply
This is just a page to post partisan opinions. When someone does post something to contrary, its reverted. Look near the end of the talk page where you find...
In other words, if something isn't part of our movement, don't put it here. Could you imagine a print encyclopedia putting in articles of this partisan and short-term nature? 72.255.99.114 13:15, 19 October 2006 (UTC) reply
I have come across this entry, courtesy Google, in my research on the subject of impeachment, and found the content the most comprehensive of all the Search finds I have checked so far. The content is factual and balanced in listing pro-con views on the subject. The entry may be revised or complemented, but should NOT be deleted. I strongly recommend that the entry be removed from the deletion candidacy.
Your comment is precisely the problem with this article. Only hundreds of people out of millions believe in this "movement" that has little attention outside of Cindy Sheehan.
The result was keep...again. *sigh* - Mailer Diablo 16:48, 24 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Procedural nom. It was placed by 72.255.99.114 who could not create a new page with the reason this is simply a long partisan editorial and inappropriate in an encylopedia. Previous AfD is here -- Wafulz 02:45, 19 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The only reason I could think of to delete this article is its probable POV statements. But that's something needs to be worked on, not a reason to delete the article. AQu01rius ( User | Talk | Websites) 03:28, 19 October 2006 (UTC) reply
This is just a page to post partisan opinions. When someone does post something to contrary, its reverted. Look near the end of the talk page where you find...
In other words, if something isn't part of our movement, don't put it here. Could you imagine a print encyclopedia putting in articles of this partisan and short-term nature? 72.255.99.114 13:15, 19 October 2006 (UTC) reply
I have come across this entry, courtesy Google, in my research on the subject of impeachment, and found the content the most comprehensive of all the Search finds I have checked so far. The content is factual and balanced in listing pro-con views on the subject. The entry may be revised or complemented, but should NOT be deleted. I strongly recommend that the entry be removed from the deletion candidacy.
Your comment is precisely the problem with this article. Only hundreds of people out of millions believe in this "movement" that has little attention outside of Cindy Sheehan.