The result was keep. Nominated in good faith but no consensus to delete. The issue of merging, trimming, renaming or what have you can continue on the article's talk page ( non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman ( talk) 14:12, 25 January 2009 (UTC) reply
While there is no argument that George W. Bush has been less than popular during his time as President, this article appears to be a strong WP:NPOV push attempting to construct a movement that has never officially taken hold. The article is even lead with the information that "The House of Representatives Judiciary Committee has not considered the impeachment of President Bush, and the House of Representatives has taken no action to do so. The Democratic Party leadership has indicated that they have no intention of resolving to impeach him." Furthermore, the actual size and contents of the article far outweigh the articles for actual impeachment hearings, as in such examples as Impeachment of Bill Clinton and Impeachment of Andrew Johnson. Looking further, there already exists an article discussing Criticism of George W. Bush, which contains some information which is redundant comparred to those points discussed in the movement article, including Katrina, wiretapping, Iraq, and torture. While I can understand the controversial nature of the contents, I feel that it's best suited as a condensed version of itself within the existing Critcism of George W. Bush article. -- TRTX T / C 16:55, 20 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Re-opened by Fritzpoll ( talk) 18:09, 20 January 2009 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Nominated in good faith but no consensus to delete. The issue of merging, trimming, renaming or what have you can continue on the article's talk page ( non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman ( talk) 14:12, 25 January 2009 (UTC) reply
While there is no argument that George W. Bush has been less than popular during his time as President, this article appears to be a strong WP:NPOV push attempting to construct a movement that has never officially taken hold. The article is even lead with the information that "The House of Representatives Judiciary Committee has not considered the impeachment of President Bush, and the House of Representatives has taken no action to do so. The Democratic Party leadership has indicated that they have no intention of resolving to impeach him." Furthermore, the actual size and contents of the article far outweigh the articles for actual impeachment hearings, as in such examples as Impeachment of Bill Clinton and Impeachment of Andrew Johnson. Looking further, there already exists an article discussing Criticism of George W. Bush, which contains some information which is redundant comparred to those points discussed in the movement article, including Katrina, wiretapping, Iraq, and torture. While I can understand the controversial nature of the contents, I feel that it's best suited as a condensed version of itself within the existing Critcism of George W. Bush article. -- TRTX T / C 16:55, 20 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Re-opened by Fritzpoll ( talk) 18:09, 20 January 2009 (UTC) reply