The result was no consensus or "nomination withdrawn", take your pick. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:14, 1 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Not a notable cur: no reliable, secondary sources were found. Sites such as Dog Breed Info, Dog Breeds A-Z, and Sarah's Dogs are not suitable since they fail to meet the criteria for self-published sources; nothing whatsoever is stated about the authors of the pages -- not even their names -- or why, implicitly or explicitly, their information is valid and worth referencing in an encyclopedia article. This cur is also listed in a couple of books that provide no information about it. Anna talk 14:08, 11 July 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus or "nomination withdrawn", take your pick. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:14, 1 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Not a notable cur: no reliable, secondary sources were found. Sites such as Dog Breed Info, Dog Breeds A-Z, and Sarah's Dogs are not suitable since they fail to meet the criteria for self-published sources; nothing whatsoever is stated about the authors of the pages -- not even their names -- or why, implicitly or explicitly, their information is valid and worth referencing in an encyclopedia article. This cur is also listed in a couple of books that provide no information about it. Anna talk 14:08, 11 July 2011 (UTC) reply