- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 14:42, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
Mou Rong (Tang dynasty)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Mou Rong (Tang dynasty) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article may not meet the
WP:GNG guidelines required for inclusion. Note that this is about the person from the Tang dynasty, not about
Mou Rong from the Han dynasty, who
is verifiable, if not notable.
Gamingforfun
365
00:49, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of Education-related deletion discussions.
Gamingforfun365 00:49, 2 June 2019 (UTC) - Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of China-related deletion discussions.
Gamingforfun365 00:49, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
- Comment He is mentioned in this Journal of Chinese Studies article as the "obscure early ninth-century figure Mou Rong". 188.216.192.206 ( talk) 06:47, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:TNT. It's an unsourced one-line substub. Although his poem(s) are included in the Tang poem anthology, I couldn't find any info about this person except a Baidu page that says he was fabricated by Ming dynasty people (not sure how reliable that is). In any case, this page is completely useless in its current state. The Han dynasty Mou Rong, on the other hand, it definitely notable. - Zanhe ( talk) 07:18, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- If he were indeed included in the
Three Hundred Tang Poems, that would make him ipso facto highly notable. As for unsourced, see my previous comment.
188.216.192.206 (
talk)
13:57, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- But are his poems in fact included in the
Three Hundred Tang Poems? His name doesn't appear in the list of poets in that article. --
Metropolitan90
(talk)
12:27, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
- That's why I wrote "If he were ...". 188.216.192.3 ( talk) 14:16, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
- But are his poems in fact included in the
Three Hundred Tang Poems? His name doesn't appear in the list of poets in that article. --
Metropolitan90
(talk)
12:27, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
- If he were indeed included in the
Three Hundred Tang Poems, that would make him ipso facto highly notable. As for unsourced, see my previous comment.
188.216.192.206 (
talk)
13:57, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 14:42, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
Mou Rong (Tang dynasty)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Mou Rong (Tang dynasty) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article may not meet the
WP:GNG guidelines required for inclusion. Note that this is about the person from the Tang dynasty, not about
Mou Rong from the Han dynasty, who
is verifiable, if not notable.
Gamingforfun
365
00:49, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of Education-related deletion discussions.
Gamingforfun365 00:49, 2 June 2019 (UTC) - Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of China-related deletion discussions.
Gamingforfun365 00:49, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
- Comment He is mentioned in this Journal of Chinese Studies article as the "obscure early ninth-century figure Mou Rong". 188.216.192.206 ( talk) 06:47, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:TNT. It's an unsourced one-line substub. Although his poem(s) are included in the Tang poem anthology, I couldn't find any info about this person except a Baidu page that says he was fabricated by Ming dynasty people (not sure how reliable that is). In any case, this page is completely useless in its current state. The Han dynasty Mou Rong, on the other hand, it definitely notable. - Zanhe ( talk) 07:18, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- If he were indeed included in the
Three Hundred Tang Poems, that would make him ipso facto highly notable. As for unsourced, see my previous comment.
188.216.192.206 (
talk)
13:57, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- But are his poems in fact included in the
Three Hundred Tang Poems? His name doesn't appear in the list of poets in that article. --
Metropolitan90
(talk)
12:27, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
- That's why I wrote "If he were ...". 188.216.192.3 ( talk) 14:16, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
- But are his poems in fact included in the
Three Hundred Tang Poems? His name doesn't appear in the list of poets in that article. --
Metropolitan90
(talk)
12:27, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
- If he were indeed included in the
Three Hundred Tang Poems, that would make him ipso facto highly notable. As for unsourced, see my previous comment.
188.216.192.206 (
talk)
13:57, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.