- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy Delete by Bbb23â. (non-admin closure) Lightoil ( talk) 04:27, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
MorrisâPutnam point
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- MorrisâPutnam point (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) â ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books ¡ news ¡ scholar ¡ free images ¡ WP refs) ¡ FENS ¡ JSTOR ¡ TWL)
This looks like a hoax to me. Before requesting a speedy deletion as a blatant hoax, I would like to have a couple of opinions and probably share some good laughs. Ruud Buitelaar ( talk) 04:08, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Ruud Buitelaar ( talk) 04:08, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - the 2 external links at the bottom of the article pretty much tell you everything you need to know.
- The image file on Commons says it was produced by Chaze Michael Michaels - a possible relative of Chazz Michael Michaels?
- -- A. B. ( talk ⢠contribs ⢠global count) 04:29, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete, agree with above, hoax, nice find. â siro Ď o 04:54, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: Wow, not caught for 14.4 years! So many funny lines in there too. This one belongs in the
WP:HOAXLIST for sure.
HenryMP02 (
talk)
05:40, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- Perhaps even funnier is the number of editors who made minor revisions to the article, presumably without looking too long at it. HenryMP02 ( talk) 05:45, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy Delete by Bbb23â. (non-admin closure) Lightoil ( talk) 04:27, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
MorrisâPutnam point
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- MorrisâPutnam point (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) â ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books ¡ news ¡ scholar ¡ free images ¡ WP refs) ¡ FENS ¡ JSTOR ¡ TWL)
This looks like a hoax to me. Before requesting a speedy deletion as a blatant hoax, I would like to have a couple of opinions and probably share some good laughs. Ruud Buitelaar ( talk) 04:08, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Ruud Buitelaar ( talk) 04:08, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - the 2 external links at the bottom of the article pretty much tell you everything you need to know.
- The image file on Commons says it was produced by Chaze Michael Michaels - a possible relative of Chazz Michael Michaels?
- -- A. B. ( talk ⢠contribs ⢠global count) 04:29, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete, agree with above, hoax, nice find. â siro Ď o 04:54, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: Wow, not caught for 14.4 years! So many funny lines in there too. This one belongs in the
WP:HOAXLIST for sure.
HenryMP02 (
talk)
05:40, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- Perhaps even funnier is the number of editors who made minor revisions to the article, presumably without looking too long at it. HenryMP02 ( talk) 05:45, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.