- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 18:10, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
Moonit
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Moonit ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable failed startup. There are some articles about winning bakeoffs and getting funding, but they didn't do anything notable and shut down. Sure, those articles might mean they meet WP:GNG, but the company doesn't mean WP:CORP in any substantive way. Mikeblas ( talk) 20:00, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:14, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:14, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:15, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
Redirect to the Tech Crunch 50 article, I'm not showing lasting notabilty for the startup company being discussed.
Oaktree b (
talk)
16:27, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
- There's no Tech Crunch 50 article. Do you mean
TechCrunch? That article doesn't even mention the TechCrunch 50 conference. --
Mikeblas (
talk)
17:52, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
- There was a blue link to the TechCrunch50, which seems to redirect to Tech Crunch... I probably wouldn't redirect there; without context it doesn't really make sense. Delete instead. Oaktree b ( talk) 21:11, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Lacking in any significant coverage, not evidence of WP:GNG. OhNoitsJamie Talk 00:01, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 18:10, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
Moonit
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Moonit ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable failed startup. There are some articles about winning bakeoffs and getting funding, but they didn't do anything notable and shut down. Sure, those articles might mean they meet WP:GNG, but the company doesn't mean WP:CORP in any substantive way. Mikeblas ( talk) 20:00, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:14, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:14, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:15, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
Redirect to the Tech Crunch 50 article, I'm not showing lasting notabilty for the startup company being discussed.
Oaktree b (
talk)
16:27, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
- There's no Tech Crunch 50 article. Do you mean
TechCrunch? That article doesn't even mention the TechCrunch 50 conference. --
Mikeblas (
talk)
17:52, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
- There was a blue link to the TechCrunch50, which seems to redirect to Tech Crunch... I probably wouldn't redirect there; without context it doesn't really make sense. Delete instead. Oaktree b ( talk) 21:11, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Lacking in any significant coverage, not evidence of WP:GNG. OhNoitsJamie Talk 00:01, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.