The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep.
RL0919 (
talk) 00:04, 4 October 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete. note that it also fails WP:NALBUM and WP:COPYVIO. The main bulk of the article consists of long paraphrases of critics reviews - these are certainly violations of copyright. While I was at it, I also changed the title of the article to accurately reflect its subject.
Smerus (
talk) 07:12, 19 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep per
WP:NALBUM The article's COPYVIO issue has been addressed, and the reviews will be reworked in due course.
Niggle1892 (
talk) 17:03, 22 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep per criteria 1 of
WP:NALBUM. The album has an entry on pages 361-365 of the reference work American Opera Singers and Their Recordings: Critical Commentaries and Discographies, Clyde T. McCants, 2004, McFarland Press. It's also reviewed in The Penguin guide to compact discs, cassettes, and LPs, 1986, Page 547, Edward Greenfield, Robert Layton, Ivan March. The album was also reviewed in High Performance Review, 1984, Volumes 3-4 - Page 167. The critical review in Gramophone can be viewed
here, and a critical review in The New York Times can be viewed
here.
4meter4 (
talk) 19:14, 22 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, --
RoySmith(talk) 23:56, 26 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Comment For further coverage, see The New Records, Vol. 52-53, 1984, p. cxiii; Peter Gammond's Opera on Compact Disc, 1987, p. 41; Opernwelt, Vol. 26, 1985, p. 142.
Niggle1892 (
talk) 00:30, 27 September 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep.
RL0919 (
talk) 00:04, 4 October 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete. note that it also fails WP:NALBUM and WP:COPYVIO. The main bulk of the article consists of long paraphrases of critics reviews - these are certainly violations of copyright. While I was at it, I also changed the title of the article to accurately reflect its subject.
Smerus (
talk) 07:12, 19 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep per
WP:NALBUM The article's COPYVIO issue has been addressed, and the reviews will be reworked in due course.
Niggle1892 (
talk) 17:03, 22 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep per criteria 1 of
WP:NALBUM. The album has an entry on pages 361-365 of the reference work American Opera Singers and Their Recordings: Critical Commentaries and Discographies, Clyde T. McCants, 2004, McFarland Press. It's also reviewed in The Penguin guide to compact discs, cassettes, and LPs, 1986, Page 547, Edward Greenfield, Robert Layton, Ivan March. The album was also reviewed in High Performance Review, 1984, Volumes 3-4 - Page 167. The critical review in Gramophone can be viewed
here, and a critical review in The New York Times can be viewed
here.
4meter4 (
talk) 19:14, 22 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, --
RoySmith(talk) 23:56, 26 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Comment For further coverage, see The New Records, Vol. 52-53, 1984, p. cxiii; Peter Gammond's Opera on Compact Disc, 1987, p. 41; Opernwelt, Vol. 26, 1985, p. 142.
Niggle1892 (
talk) 00:30, 27 September 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.