The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 21:06, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
WP:BLP of a visual artist, not making or sourcing any strong claim to passage of WP:CREATIVE. The notability claim on offer here is that she exists, with no indication whatsoever that she's achieved anything (e.g. significant art awards, major exhibitions, etc.) that would make her existence encyclopedically noteworthy -- and the sourcing consists of three local human interest pieces in her hometown local media, being used entirely to support background trivia on her family life and personal hobbies rather than any potentially notability-building information about her work as an artist. Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt the article from having to contain much more substance and much better sourcing than this. Bearcat ( talk) 17:43, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 21:06, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
WP:BLP of a visual artist, not making or sourcing any strong claim to passage of WP:CREATIVE. The notability claim on offer here is that she exists, with no indication whatsoever that she's achieved anything (e.g. significant art awards, major exhibitions, etc.) that would make her existence encyclopedically noteworthy -- and the sourcing consists of three local human interest pieces in her hometown local media, being used entirely to support background trivia on her family life and personal hobbies rather than any potentially notability-building information about her work as an artist. Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt the article from having to contain much more substance and much better sourcing than this. Bearcat ( talk) 17:43, 10 December 2021 (UTC)