The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete failing
WP:BASIC and
WP:ENT. Just a typical porn performer with typical coverage (porn interviews, press releases, film databases). Independent RS coverage is nil. Achievements would not even satisfy the now-deprecated PORNBIO SNG.
• Gene93k (
talk)
12:30, 3 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Porn award nominations were removed from PORNBIO years ago because they are given out too prolifically to be a credible indicator of notability. AVN nominates 15 candidates per category (as many as 20 for GayVN). Everybody (especially every major studio) gets nominated for something. XBIZ nominations come from XBIZ clients. In-house employee of the month awards like Twistys did not pass PORNBIO when it was in effect. PORNBIO was taken down altogether in 2019. Achievements without independent RS acknowledgement don't establish notability. That applies to WP:ENT and
WP:ANYBIO as well as the now deprecated PORNBIO SNG.
WP:GNG/WP:BASIC comes from significant coverage from multiple reliable sources that are independent of the subject, not present in the article nor found in independent searching.
• Gene93k (
talk)
16:28, 4 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete we have gotten rid of the horrible porn notification guidelines and have stopped treating the promotionalist schemes of the pornography industry as in any way a sign of notability. There is not actual indepdent sourcing here that would lead to passing GNG. Wikipedia needs to stop being a front for the pornography industry.
John Pack Lambert (
talk)
16:01, 4 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete There are no sources to be found to support this person's notability. Simply being mentioned in porn press releases, and being nominate for porn awards, are not enough.
Zaathras (
talk)
03:25, 6 November 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete failing
WP:BASIC and
WP:ENT. Just a typical porn performer with typical coverage (porn interviews, press releases, film databases). Independent RS coverage is nil. Achievements would not even satisfy the now-deprecated PORNBIO SNG.
• Gene93k (
talk)
12:30, 3 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Porn award nominations were removed from PORNBIO years ago because they are given out too prolifically to be a credible indicator of notability. AVN nominates 15 candidates per category (as many as 20 for GayVN). Everybody (especially every major studio) gets nominated for something. XBIZ nominations come from XBIZ clients. In-house employee of the month awards like Twistys did not pass PORNBIO when it was in effect. PORNBIO was taken down altogether in 2019. Achievements without independent RS acknowledgement don't establish notability. That applies to WP:ENT and
WP:ANYBIO as well as the now deprecated PORNBIO SNG.
WP:GNG/WP:BASIC comes from significant coverage from multiple reliable sources that are independent of the subject, not present in the article nor found in independent searching.
• Gene93k (
talk)
16:28, 4 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete we have gotten rid of the horrible porn notification guidelines and have stopped treating the promotionalist schemes of the pornography industry as in any way a sign of notability. There is not actual indepdent sourcing here that would lead to passing GNG. Wikipedia needs to stop being a front for the pornography industry.
John Pack Lambert (
talk)
16:01, 4 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete There are no sources to be found to support this person's notability. Simply being mentioned in porn press releases, and being nominate for porn awards, are not enough.
Zaathras (
talk)
03:25, 6 November 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.