- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 10:16, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
Mohammad-Ali Jadidoleslam
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Mohammad-Ali Jadidoleslam ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not appear to meet WP:CREATIVE or WP:GNG. BangJan1999 18:57, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Photography and Iran. BangJan1999 18:57, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
- delete I had CSD'ed the article under A7, but it was soon recreated. Having a collection of more than thousand cameras, or photos from particular era is not a claim for notability. The individual is also not a notable photographer according to the criteria for creative professional. We still could have an article about the individual if they had significant coverage in reliable source. But as there is no significant coverage either, the person fails general notability criteria as well. —usernamekiran (talk) 00:15, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- Keep The individual is a notable photographer according to the criteria for creative professional because he has created a well-known body of work. His has taken portrait photos of 1500 Iranian artists among them Mohammad-Hossein Shahriar, Reza Kianian, Tony Zarrindast, and many more. The article in Farsi has been live since 2016 which indicates his notability hasn't been challenged there. But the article in its current form is a stub an needs to be expanded. Bellswillring ( talk) 04:20, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete because taking a lot of photos or having a lot of cameras is not a claim for notability.
Fad Ariff (
talk)
13:24, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- I understand your argument but I suppose as far as photography is concerned, notability should be interpreted within the limits of the profession. Having recorded historical photos of figures like Shahriar and preserving instances of the 1979 Iranian revolution in Tabriz is quite significant for a photographer. However, the article needs time to be improved. Bellswillring ( talk) 11:31, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 20:50, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
KeepI tried to include in the article how Jadidoleslam "has created a well-known body of work" in order to satisfy WP:CREATIVE. Again I think notability should be interpreted within the limits of the profession. Having recorded photos of historical figures like Shahriar and preserving instances of the 1979 Iranian revolution in Tabriz is quite significant for a photographer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bellswillring ( talk • contribs) 11:34, 22 December 2022 (UTC)- Note: I've striked this duplicate vote. User:Bellswillring already voted at 04:20, 10 December 2022, a double vote is unnecessary. VickKiang (talk) 02:20, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:46, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete no sources found beyond one website, no critical review of his work and it's not discussed in other forms of media. He maybe prolific, but I don't see GNG here. Oaktree b ( talk) 01:32, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 10:16, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
Mohammad-Ali Jadidoleslam
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Mohammad-Ali Jadidoleslam ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not appear to meet WP:CREATIVE or WP:GNG. BangJan1999 18:57, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Photography and Iran. BangJan1999 18:57, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
- delete I had CSD'ed the article under A7, but it was soon recreated. Having a collection of more than thousand cameras, or photos from particular era is not a claim for notability. The individual is also not a notable photographer according to the criteria for creative professional. We still could have an article about the individual if they had significant coverage in reliable source. But as there is no significant coverage either, the person fails general notability criteria as well. —usernamekiran (talk) 00:15, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- Keep The individual is a notable photographer according to the criteria for creative professional because he has created a well-known body of work. His has taken portrait photos of 1500 Iranian artists among them Mohammad-Hossein Shahriar, Reza Kianian, Tony Zarrindast, and many more. The article in Farsi has been live since 2016 which indicates his notability hasn't been challenged there. But the article in its current form is a stub an needs to be expanded. Bellswillring ( talk) 04:20, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete because taking a lot of photos or having a lot of cameras is not a claim for notability.
Fad Ariff (
talk)
13:24, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- I understand your argument but I suppose as far as photography is concerned, notability should be interpreted within the limits of the profession. Having recorded historical photos of figures like Shahriar and preserving instances of the 1979 Iranian revolution in Tabriz is quite significant for a photographer. However, the article needs time to be improved. Bellswillring ( talk) 11:31, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 20:50, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
KeepI tried to include in the article how Jadidoleslam "has created a well-known body of work" in order to satisfy WP:CREATIVE. Again I think notability should be interpreted within the limits of the profession. Having recorded photos of historical figures like Shahriar and preserving instances of the 1979 Iranian revolution in Tabriz is quite significant for a photographer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bellswillring ( talk • contribs) 11:34, 22 December 2022 (UTC)- Note: I've striked this duplicate vote. User:Bellswillring already voted at 04:20, 10 December 2022, a double vote is unnecessary. VickKiang (talk) 02:20, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:46, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete no sources found beyond one website, no critical review of his work and it's not discussed in other forms of media. He maybe prolific, but I don't see GNG here. Oaktree b ( talk) 01:32, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.