The result was delete. Tone 15:27, 5 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Article appears to be promotional in nature, does not provide proof of notability, and has no reliable sources; all three references are to neo-Nazi websites that do not satisfy WP: RS. Stonemason89 ( talk) 02:52, 24 March 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Tone 15:27, 5 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Article appears to be promotional in nature, does not provide proof of notability, and has no reliable sources; all three references are to neo-Nazi websites that do not satisfy WP: RS. Stonemason89 ( talk) 02:52, 24 March 2010 (UTC) reply