The result was delete. - brenneman {L} 06:26, 3 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Promotional essays on the Christian Missionary movement. Fails: Wikipedia:Neutral Point of View and WP:NOT#Original Thought. Most sections are written in a first-person manner and ask rhetorical questions and the accompanied author attributions for four sections make them highly likely copy-and-pasted essays (i.e copyright violations). -- Netsnipe (Talk) 04:55, 27 July 2006 (UTC) reply
*Comment I feel that there is vaulable content contained in the contributions. I agree that the contributors may need to edit their input to ensure that Wikipedia standards are met, but the material is worth keeping.-- Rcinguyton 23:31, 2 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - brenneman {L} 06:26, 3 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Promotional essays on the Christian Missionary movement. Fails: Wikipedia:Neutral Point of View and WP:NOT#Original Thought. Most sections are written in a first-person manner and ask rhetorical questions and the accompanied author attributions for four sections make them highly likely copy-and-pasted essays (i.e copyright violations). -- Netsnipe (Talk) 04:55, 27 July 2006 (UTC) reply
*Comment I feel that there is vaulable content contained in the contributions. I agree that the contributors may need to edit their input to ensure that Wikipedia standards are met, but the material is worth keeping.-- Rcinguyton 23:31, 2 August 2006 (UTC) reply