The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep. No good reason for deletion. Had sources when it was nominated, so the claim is patently false. --
Necrothesp (
talk) 10:26, 3 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Speedy keep per
WP:CSK#1: no valid rationale for deletion has been given.
BilletsMauves€500 18:10, 3 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep as has reliable sources book coverage as mentioned above,
Atlantic306 (
talk) 16:58, 6 August 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep. No good reason for deletion. Had sources when it was nominated, so the claim is patently false. --
Necrothesp (
talk) 10:26, 3 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Speedy keep per
WP:CSK#1: no valid rationale for deletion has been given.
BilletsMauves€500 18:10, 3 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep as has reliable sources book coverage as mentioned above,
Atlantic306 (
talk) 16:58, 6 August 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.