The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. An article with no content other than an infobox and a see also section. Perhaps a PROD would have taken care of this but here we are...
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 00:16, 15 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete - Did not meet notability guidelines.--
Richie Campbell (
talk) 03:21, 8 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete – Makes no assertion of notability.
Graham (
talk) 04:05, 8 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete unless the article receives some first aid.
Softlavender (
talk) 10:07, 9 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete. Immediately below the title of the article is the See also section? No way is this article useful. —
Prhartcom♥ 05:13, 10 June 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. An article with no content other than an infobox and a see also section. Perhaps a PROD would have taken care of this but here we are...
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 00:16, 15 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete - Did not meet notability guidelines.--
Richie Campbell (
talk) 03:21, 8 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete – Makes no assertion of notability.
Graham (
talk) 04:05, 8 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete unless the article receives some first aid.
Softlavender (
talk) 10:07, 9 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete. Immediately below the title of the article is the See also section? No way is this article useful. —
Prhartcom♥ 05:13, 10 June 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.