The result was Redirect to Blowfly (artist). The creator and subject of the article has agreed to this. Closed by the nominator, WP:NAC. Vyvyan Basterd ( talk) 03:17, 14 October 2009 (UTC) reply
This article does not meet WP:V and thus not WP:BLP. It also fails WP:BIO for the same reasons. The sources listed are not reliable sources showing non-trivial coverage but instead a combination of references to other Wikipedia articles and examples of trivial coverage and non-independent sites. So, delete primarily per WP:V and WP:BLP. It also appears that the creator SheighZam ( talk · contribs) has a conflict of interest with regard to this article. If someone can think of a reasonable target to redirect to I'm not entirely opposed to that (though I prefer deletion in this case) but it needs to be discussed first due to the name of this article. Having a redirect point to a BLP that subsequently turns up on Google when someone does a search for "miss clit" is a situation we should consider with great care. Vyvyan Basterd ( talk) 15:51, 12 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Additionally, as far as WP:Creative, Miss Clit meets the following criteria: **The person has created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work, that has been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film, or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews.The person's work either (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) has won significant critical attention. Please advise what else is needed for deletion to be no longer considered, and thank you for taking the time to review. SheighZam ( talk) 07:33, 13 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result was Redirect to Blowfly (artist). The creator and subject of the article has agreed to this. Closed by the nominator, WP:NAC. Vyvyan Basterd ( talk) 03:17, 14 October 2009 (UTC) reply
This article does not meet WP:V and thus not WP:BLP. It also fails WP:BIO for the same reasons. The sources listed are not reliable sources showing non-trivial coverage but instead a combination of references to other Wikipedia articles and examples of trivial coverage and non-independent sites. So, delete primarily per WP:V and WP:BLP. It also appears that the creator SheighZam ( talk · contribs) has a conflict of interest with regard to this article. If someone can think of a reasonable target to redirect to I'm not entirely opposed to that (though I prefer deletion in this case) but it needs to be discussed first due to the name of this article. Having a redirect point to a BLP that subsequently turns up on Google when someone does a search for "miss clit" is a situation we should consider with great care. Vyvyan Basterd ( talk) 15:51, 12 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Additionally, as far as WP:Creative, Miss Clit meets the following criteria: **The person has created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work, that has been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film, or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews.The person's work either (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) has won significant critical attention. Please advise what else is needed for deletion to be no longer considered, and thank you for taking the time to review. SheighZam ( talk) 07:33, 13 October 2009 (UTC) reply