- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 19:37, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
Miriam Dudley
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Miriam Dudley ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article subject does not appear to be notable under WP:GNG or WP:NACADEMIC. Additionally the article's subject, pursuant to WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE has also requested, via OTRS, that that this article be deleted. Barkeep49 ( talk) 19:30, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
- Just editing to make clear I performed a typical BEFORE to make my GNG/NACADEMIC assessment. So I am arguing lack of notability in addition to the requested delete. Best,
Barkeep49 (
talk)
22:09, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
- (nomination is impeccable Xxanthippe ( talk) 23:46, 20 December 2019 (UTC))
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:00, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Northern Ireland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:00, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete at subject's request. No notability found anyway. Xxanthippe ( talk) 22:02, 20 December 2019 (UTC).
- Delete both because this is a reasonable request of someone who at best is borderline notable, and because I couldn't find even that borderline level of notability through either WP:PROF or WP:GNG. — David Eppstein ( talk) 23:02, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per the above. Nothing suggests the individual is so notable that the deletion request should be overridden. XOR'easter ( talk) 16:26, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete nothing suggests they are notable at all. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 03:42, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - Per Barkeep49’s explanation above if subject has made such demands then this is a no brainer. A delete is most appplicable here. Celestina007 ( talk) 0 16:19, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 19:37, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
Miriam Dudley
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Miriam Dudley ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article subject does not appear to be notable under WP:GNG or WP:NACADEMIC. Additionally the article's subject, pursuant to WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE has also requested, via OTRS, that that this article be deleted. Barkeep49 ( talk) 19:30, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
- Just editing to make clear I performed a typical BEFORE to make my GNG/NACADEMIC assessment. So I am arguing lack of notability in addition to the requested delete. Best,
Barkeep49 (
talk)
22:09, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
- (nomination is impeccable Xxanthippe ( talk) 23:46, 20 December 2019 (UTC))
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:00, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Northern Ireland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:00, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete at subject's request. No notability found anyway. Xxanthippe ( talk) 22:02, 20 December 2019 (UTC).
- Delete both because this is a reasonable request of someone who at best is borderline notable, and because I couldn't find even that borderline level of notability through either WP:PROF or WP:GNG. — David Eppstein ( talk) 23:02, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per the above. Nothing suggests the individual is so notable that the deletion request should be overridden. XOR'easter ( talk) 16:26, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete nothing suggests they are notable at all. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 03:42, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - Per Barkeep49’s explanation above if subject has made such demands then this is a no brainer. A delete is most appplicable here. Celestina007 ( talk) 0 16:19, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.