From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:46, 12 January 2019 (UTC) reply

Mireasă pentru fiul meu season 2 (Romania)

Mireasă pentru fiul meu season 2 (Romania) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is very outdated, cites no sources and is improperly formatted. Most edits that have been made to this article from 2013-present seem to be from a maintenance perspective. The main article for this series Mireasă pentru fiul meu already has a small recap of this season and who won. Alucard 16 ❯❯❯ chat? 23:48, 4 January 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 06:55, 5 January 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 06:55, 5 January 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Delete – for pretty much the same rationale I just offered at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Star Academy 9 (France). In this case too, the "season" article is completely unsourced, and the base Mireasă pentru fiul meu contains a sufficient summary of the season. Again, there is not enough valid content to justify a "standalone" season article in this case. -- IJBall ( contribstalk) 15:13, 5 January 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - the article is in terible condition and not suitable for mainspace. A lot of drive-by editors (and sadly, not limited to them alone) are too eager to create reality season tables, without actually adding any other information or even sources to the article. As nom said, the main article is better for this. -- Gonnym ( talk) 19:26, 5 January 2019 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:46, 12 January 2019 (UTC) reply

Mireasă pentru fiul meu season 2 (Romania)

Mireasă pentru fiul meu season 2 (Romania) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is very outdated, cites no sources and is improperly formatted. Most edits that have been made to this article from 2013-present seem to be from a maintenance perspective. The main article for this series Mireasă pentru fiul meu already has a small recap of this season and who won. Alucard 16 ❯❯❯ chat? 23:48, 4 January 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 06:55, 5 January 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 06:55, 5 January 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Delete – for pretty much the same rationale I just offered at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Star Academy 9 (France). In this case too, the "season" article is completely unsourced, and the base Mireasă pentru fiul meu contains a sufficient summary of the season. Again, there is not enough valid content to justify a "standalone" season article in this case. -- IJBall ( contribstalk) 15:13, 5 January 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - the article is in terible condition and not suitable for mainspace. A lot of drive-by editors (and sadly, not limited to them alone) are too eager to create reality season tables, without actually adding any other information or even sources to the article. As nom said, the main article is better for this. -- Gonnym ( talk) 19:26, 5 January 2019 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook