The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. A valid deletion rationale was not presented.
NORTH AMERICA1000 23:13, 18 March 2015 (UTC)reply
This article has been tagged as lacking sources for over three years. Sooner or later, we have to say: source it or lose it. A redirect to the Turtles page is an appropriate result IMO. Guy (
Help!) 00:08, 12 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep per sources added by Valoem, the TCJ one in particular being a good solid find.
Artw (
talk) 16:36, 12 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Speedy Keep A disruptive nomination from Guy, articles should only be nominated when sources cannot be found, not when citations are required. So the answer is source it. This nomination was for clean up not deletion.
Valoemtalkcontrib 12:28, 13 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Speedy Keep and trout the nominator, nonsense nom, blatant lack of
Wikipedia:BEFORE, do not waste the community time just because you're too lazy to make the proper searches.
Cavarrone 20:40, 18 March 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. A valid deletion rationale was not presented.
NORTH AMERICA1000 23:13, 18 March 2015 (UTC)reply
This article has been tagged as lacking sources for over three years. Sooner or later, we have to say: source it or lose it. A redirect to the Turtles page is an appropriate result IMO. Guy (
Help!) 00:08, 12 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep per sources added by Valoem, the TCJ one in particular being a good solid find.
Artw (
talk) 16:36, 12 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Speedy Keep A disruptive nomination from Guy, articles should only be nominated when sources cannot be found, not when citations are required. So the answer is source it. This nomination was for clean up not deletion.
Valoemtalkcontrib 12:28, 13 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Speedy Keep and trout the nominator, nonsense nom, blatant lack of
Wikipedia:BEFORE, do not waste the community time just because you're too lazy to make the proper searches.
Cavarrone 20:40, 18 March 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.