From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Thanks everyone for participating and assuming good faith. Missvain ( talk) 18:29, 3 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Mir Junaid

Mir Junaid (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-Notable Politician. Fails WP:NPOL, According to WP:POLITICIAN, politicians are notable if they held international, national or state/province post. Also somehow looks promotional to me. -- Jammumylove Talk to me or CHECK MY RECENT WORK 15:28, 6 April 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- Jammumylove Talk to me or CHECK MY RECENT WORK 15:28, 6 April 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. -- Jammumylove Talk to me or CHECK MY RECENT WORK 15:28, 6 April 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- Jammumylove Talk to me or CHECK MY RECENT WORK 15:28, 6 April 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Delete: The subject has never been elected into any legislative bodies thus failing NPOL. In that case he must pass general GNG criteria. As I can see, there are no sources giving him enough significant coverage. I dont know whether there are any sources in local language. Kichu🐘 Need any help? 14:35, 7 April 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Comment The person fails WP:NPOL but has been covered in mainstream media as social activist. Riteboke ( talk) 08:14, 14 April 2021 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Further discussion needed on notability based on other notability guidelines.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Aseleste ( t, e | c, l) 08:50, 14 April 2021 (UTC) reply

Comment Riteboke, Not significantly tho, Passing mentions don't demonstrate notability. He Fails WP:NPOL and WP:SIGCOV -- Jammumylove Talk to me or CHECK MY RECENT WORK 11:07, 19 April 2021 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 15:01, 23 April 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Thanks everyone for participating and assuming good faith. Missvain ( talk) 18:29, 3 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Mir Junaid

Mir Junaid (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-Notable Politician. Fails WP:NPOL, According to WP:POLITICIAN, politicians are notable if they held international, national or state/province post. Also somehow looks promotional to me. -- Jammumylove Talk to me or CHECK MY RECENT WORK 15:28, 6 April 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- Jammumylove Talk to me or CHECK MY RECENT WORK 15:28, 6 April 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. -- Jammumylove Talk to me or CHECK MY RECENT WORK 15:28, 6 April 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- Jammumylove Talk to me or CHECK MY RECENT WORK 15:28, 6 April 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Delete: The subject has never been elected into any legislative bodies thus failing NPOL. In that case he must pass general GNG criteria. As I can see, there are no sources giving him enough significant coverage. I dont know whether there are any sources in local language. Kichu🐘 Need any help? 14:35, 7 April 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Comment The person fails WP:NPOL but has been covered in mainstream media as social activist. Riteboke ( talk) 08:14, 14 April 2021 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Further discussion needed on notability based on other notability guidelines.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Aseleste ( t, e | c, l) 08:50, 14 April 2021 (UTC) reply

Comment Riteboke, Not significantly tho, Passing mentions don't demonstrate notability. He Fails WP:NPOL and WP:SIGCOV -- Jammumylove Talk to me or CHECK MY RECENT WORK 11:07, 19 April 2021 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 15:01, 23 April 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook