The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non-notable hotel without any media coverage. Created in 2012 by an account whose only edit is this article. Likely promotional, only references are a link that goes nowhere and the hotel's own website.
Fritzmann (
message me)
22:55, 8 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep. I added some references. The awards seem to establish notability. When I google Miniloft Berlin, I get articles about
Frizz23, which seems to be a related project that might include the second Miniloft building, but I'm not sure of that. Eastmain (
talk •
contribs)04:45, 9 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep, even though my knee-jerk reaction was non-notability. The architectural nominations alone would clear
WP:N... if someone can source them, please?
Last1in (
talk)
20:43, 16 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Weak keep per sources currently cited. I am annoyed by the tendency of what look like good sources to turn out to be 404s or moribund Flash sites, and I suspect but cannot verify that the Berliner Architekturpreis was an honorable mention (Auszeichnung) rather than a prizewinning finish. But the important thing is that it seems like we have enough to build a reasonable article from, satisfying the GNG. Of course there is still the matter of sorting out the subject matter. FWIW I understand
Frizz23 to be the same as
Miniloft Kreuzberg (so to speak the "third" Miniloft building, after Slender and Bender in Mitte). That raises some questions in my mind whether all three of these buildings really represent enough of a cohesive thing that we should be dealing with them in the same article, but I suppose there's no particular harm in starting out that way and splitting if sources become sufficiently numerous. --
Visviva (
talk)
02:42, 17 July 2023 (UTC)reply
This article has the tragic problem of probably being architecturally notable, but sourced primarily with hotel reviews. There's only one GNG qualifying source in the article itself, and the article only alludes to more.
SportingFlyerT·C17:14, 17 July 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non-notable hotel without any media coverage. Created in 2012 by an account whose only edit is this article. Likely promotional, only references are a link that goes nowhere and the hotel's own website.
Fritzmann (
message me)
22:55, 8 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep. I added some references. The awards seem to establish notability. When I google Miniloft Berlin, I get articles about
Frizz23, which seems to be a related project that might include the second Miniloft building, but I'm not sure of that. Eastmain (
talk •
contribs)04:45, 9 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep, even though my knee-jerk reaction was non-notability. The architectural nominations alone would clear
WP:N... if someone can source them, please?
Last1in (
talk)
20:43, 16 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Weak keep per sources currently cited. I am annoyed by the tendency of what look like good sources to turn out to be 404s or moribund Flash sites, and I suspect but cannot verify that the Berliner Architekturpreis was an honorable mention (Auszeichnung) rather than a prizewinning finish. But the important thing is that it seems like we have enough to build a reasonable article from, satisfying the GNG. Of course there is still the matter of sorting out the subject matter. FWIW I understand
Frizz23 to be the same as
Miniloft Kreuzberg (so to speak the "third" Miniloft building, after Slender and Bender in Mitte). That raises some questions in my mind whether all three of these buildings really represent enough of a cohesive thing that we should be dealing with them in the same article, but I suppose there's no particular harm in starting out that way and splitting if sources become sufficiently numerous. --
Visviva (
talk)
02:42, 17 July 2023 (UTC)reply
This article has the tragic problem of probably being architecturally notable, but sourced primarily with hotel reviews. There's only one GNG qualifying source in the article itself, and the article only alludes to more.
SportingFlyerT·C17:14, 17 July 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.