- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 10:28, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Mineral Slide, California ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
As far as I can tell, this was a mine, not a town, with emphasis on "was". The topo maps show this as a "site", with nothing there, but I've found numerous mentions of a mine of this name— routine mentions, I would add. Mangoe ( talk) 03:47, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. My search on Newspapers.com turns ups mentions of a "Mineral Slide mine", but not enough coverage to meet WP:GNG. No indication this was ever a legally recognized community, as required by WP:GEOLAND. – Lord Bolingbroke ( talk) 21:25, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. – Lord Bolingbroke ( talk) 21:38, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. – Lord Bolingbroke ( talk) 21:38, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Non-notable locale mislabeled as a "populated place" in GNIS and further misconstrued as an "unincorporated community" here. – dlthewave ☎ 05:50, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 10:28, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Mineral Slide, California ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
As far as I can tell, this was a mine, not a town, with emphasis on "was". The topo maps show this as a "site", with nothing there, but I've found numerous mentions of a mine of this name— routine mentions, I would add. Mangoe ( talk) 03:47, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. My search on Newspapers.com turns ups mentions of a "Mineral Slide mine", but not enough coverage to meet WP:GNG. No indication this was ever a legally recognized community, as required by WP:GEOLAND. – Lord Bolingbroke ( talk) 21:25, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. – Lord Bolingbroke ( talk) 21:38, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. – Lord Bolingbroke ( talk) 21:38, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Non-notable locale mislabeled as a "populated place" in GNIS and further misconstrued as an "unincorporated community" here. – dlthewave ☎ 05:50, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.