The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy delete, pure vandalism.
Pascal.Tesson 00:57, 10 September 2007 (UTC)reply
I think this article is a hoax. I can't find any evidence that this actually was an actually Supreme Court case.
Captainpanda 00:13, 10 September 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy delete, pure vandalism.
Pascal.Tesson 00:57, 10 September 2007 (UTC)reply
I think this article is a hoax. I can't find any evidence that this actually was an actually Supreme Court case.
Captainpanda 00:13, 10 September 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.