The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. North America 1000 02:21, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
The article does not meet GNG or NBUILD. Coverage is routine, run of the mill local news, an ordinary NIMBY dispute, nothing that meets RS SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and in-depth. NBUILD states "... may be notable as a result of their historic, social, economic, or architectural importance, but they require significant in-depth coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability." The article contains no claim of historic, social, economic, or architectural importance. // Timothy :: talk 12:25, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
2020-07 ✍️ create
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. North America 1000 02:21, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
The article does not meet GNG or NBUILD. Coverage is routine, run of the mill local news, an ordinary NIMBY dispute, nothing that meets RS SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and in-depth. NBUILD states "... may be notable as a result of their historic, social, economic, or architectural importance, but they require significant in-depth coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability." The article contains no claim of historic, social, economic, or architectural importance. // Timothy :: talk 12:25, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
2020-07 ✍️ create