The result of the debate was DELETE. Mo0[ talk] 16:16, 18 January 2006 (UTC) reply
This is a very in-depth treatment of a scientific theory promulgated by one book. The two editors defending the page's content deny that this is actually an attempt at orthomolecular oncology, but all the same the concept gets <300 Google hits and fails any form of notability to warrant this. JFW | T@lk 15:37, 12 January 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was DELETE. Mo0[ talk] 16:16, 18 January 2006 (UTC) reply
This is a very in-depth treatment of a scientific theory promulgated by one book. The two editors defending the page's content deny that this is actually an attempt at orthomolecular oncology, but all the same the concept gets <300 Google hits and fails any form of notability to warrant this. JFW | T@lk 15:37, 12 January 2006 (UTC) reply