From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 07:20, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Michiana Paranormal Investigations

Michiana Paranormal Investigations (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORG. Virtually all coverage is from Metro South Bend Elkhart. No indication of any coverage outside North Central Indiana. John from Idegon ( talk) 09:16, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp ( talk) 16:35, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp ( talk) 16:35, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 17:55, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply
  • leaning delete per nom, extensively sourced to local fluff pieces - David Gerard ( talk) 10:42, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Per nom. Fails WP:ORG, sources aren't impressive either. Yintan  22:28, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Keep Sources cited are credible. There are numerous paranormal groups listed under the topic "Paranormal Investigators" that meet the same criteria as this group. If you delete this then you need to delete all other groups as well. The group is based out of northern Indiana, which is why the articles cited are from the metro South Bend area. All sources are credible news agencies and media organizations. - Uediver ( talk) 11:11 7 October 2016 (UTC)
  • The following is the attached location of where other groups similar to Michiana Paranormal Investigations is listed. There are other groups listed have less citations and references than this group does however are not being considered for deletion. If you believe that this group needs to be deleted then I would and expect you to follow suit with every other group listed as well. /info/en/?search=Category:Paranormal_investigators Uediver ( talk) 01:01 8 October 2016 (UTC)
    • WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS has never been considered a good argument at AFD. We know there are lots of bad articles on Wikipedia, this is why there's a deletion procedure - David Gerard ( talk) 07:49, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 07:20, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Michiana Paranormal Investigations

Michiana Paranormal Investigations (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORG. Virtually all coverage is from Metro South Bend Elkhart. No indication of any coverage outside North Central Indiana. John from Idegon ( talk) 09:16, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp ( talk) 16:35, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp ( talk) 16:35, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 17:55, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply
  • leaning delete per nom, extensively sourced to local fluff pieces - David Gerard ( talk) 10:42, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Per nom. Fails WP:ORG, sources aren't impressive either. Yintan  22:28, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Keep Sources cited are credible. There are numerous paranormal groups listed under the topic "Paranormal Investigators" that meet the same criteria as this group. If you delete this then you need to delete all other groups as well. The group is based out of northern Indiana, which is why the articles cited are from the metro South Bend area. All sources are credible news agencies and media organizations. - Uediver ( talk) 11:11 7 October 2016 (UTC)
  • The following is the attached location of where other groups similar to Michiana Paranormal Investigations is listed. There are other groups listed have less citations and references than this group does however are not being considered for deletion. If you believe that this group needs to be deleted then I would and expect you to follow suit with every other group listed as well. /info/en/?search=Category:Paranormal_investigators Uediver ( talk) 01:01 8 October 2016 (UTC)
    • WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS has never been considered a good argument at AFD. We know there are lots of bad articles on Wikipedia, this is why there's a deletion procedure - David Gerard ( talk) 07:49, 9 October 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook