- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 15:25, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
Michael Zeldin
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Michael Zeldin ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Little to no secondary coverage. Can confirm he's contributed articles to CNN but can't find any independent sources stating that much. Trimmed much unsourced fluffery and what's left is pretty paltry. Article has been contributed to by IPs that are pretty obviously either the subject or associate(s) of his (one is geolocated to his old law firm, others are from the DC area). Might even be a CSD candidate.
Procedural nomination, per request by IP at Special:Permalink/892846485#Requesting nom? For Michael Zeldin. DannyS712 ( talk) 07:55, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator ( talk) 09:29, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:29, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - fails every one of my standards for notable lawyer. The only reliable sources are not - they are a paid notice in The Times and brief mentions in other primary sources. Bearian ( talk) 20:27, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 15:25, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
Michael Zeldin
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Michael Zeldin ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Little to no secondary coverage. Can confirm he's contributed articles to CNN but can't find any independent sources stating that much. Trimmed much unsourced fluffery and what's left is pretty paltry. Article has been contributed to by IPs that are pretty obviously either the subject or associate(s) of his (one is geolocated to his old law firm, others are from the DC area). Might even be a CSD candidate.
Procedural nomination, per request by IP at Special:Permalink/892846485#Requesting nom? For Michael Zeldin. DannyS712 ( talk) 07:55, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator ( talk) 09:29, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:29, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - fails every one of my standards for notable lawyer. The only reliable sources are not - they are a paid notice in The Times and brief mentions in other primary sources. Bearian ( talk) 20:27, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.