From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 06:47, 21 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Michael Lavery (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing actually convincing of independent notability and significant with the listed links simply being trivial and unconvincing themselves, none of them what is needed for substantiating this article, with my own searches then only finding a few links of such triviality also. There are no significant library book collections at all and I'm literally not seeing anything else better, with the history also being self-explanatory, consisting of nothing significant. SwisterTwister talk 23:21, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 02:10, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 02:10, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 02:10, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Your welcome | Democratics Talk 10:26, 6 November 2016 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, GeoffreyT2000 ( talk, contribs) 22:42, 13 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Michael Lavery as an artist has been included on a handful of websites and it isn't immediately trivial. But certainly Michael Lavery the founder of whole brain power is not trivial. It is mentioned on numerous blogs and, if not entirely dedicated to it, whole brain power has been refered to by newspapers such as the orange county register and the New york times. I believe there was also a book called something like 'eye yoga' that refers to the exercises of whole brain power. The benefits of the program may be debatable but the stir it had made meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.32.131.79 ( talk) 08:52, 14 November 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 06:47, 21 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Michael Lavery (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing actually convincing of independent notability and significant with the listed links simply being trivial and unconvincing themselves, none of them what is needed for substantiating this article, with my own searches then only finding a few links of such triviality also. There are no significant library book collections at all and I'm literally not seeing anything else better, with the history also being self-explanatory, consisting of nothing significant. SwisterTwister talk 23:21, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 02:10, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 02:10, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 02:10, 30 October 2016 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Your welcome | Democratics Talk 10:26, 6 November 2016 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, GeoffreyT2000 ( talk, contribs) 22:42, 13 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Michael Lavery as an artist has been included on a handful of websites and it isn't immediately trivial. But certainly Michael Lavery the founder of whole brain power is not trivial. It is mentioned on numerous blogs and, if not entirely dedicated to it, whole brain power has been refered to by newspapers such as the orange county register and the New york times. I believe there was also a book called something like 'eye yoga' that refers to the exercises of whole brain power. The benefits of the program may be debatable but the stir it had made meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.32.131.79 ( talk) 08:52, 14 November 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook