The result was Keep. It's either a no-consensus to delete, or a keep - either one results in the article remaining. Most of the initial deletes have been addressed/changed and while one remains, it appears as if evidence has been presented to address that. Remaining article issues can be addressed with clean-up, notability has been established. TravellingCari 15:24, 21 August 2008 (UTC) reply
Unnotable promoter of pseudoscience ( creationism) and conspiracy theories. No assertation or demonstration of importance, lacks sources and has little value. We66er ( talk) 21:02, 12 August 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. It's either a no-consensus to delete, or a keep - either one results in the article remaining. Most of the initial deletes have been addressed/changed and while one remains, it appears as if evidence has been presented to address that. Remaining article issues can be addressed with clean-up, notability has been established. TravellingCari 15:24, 21 August 2008 (UTC) reply
Unnotable promoter of pseudoscience ( creationism) and conspiracy theories. No assertation or demonstration of importance, lacks sources and has little value. We66er ( talk) 21:02, 12 August 2008 (UTC) reply