The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
What makes the nominator think that this village has no legal recognition? A click on the word "books" above shows that it is recognised by censuses.
Phil Bridger (
talk)
14:59, 31 August 2020 (UTC)reply
leaning delete There is certainly a Mian Banda in Pakistan, but I'm not the least convinced that it's anything like the place being talked about in this article. One set of references implies that it is on a substantial river; a news report recounts an address given at a seminary there with a name drop implying that everyone in Pakistan knows where it is. Meanwhile I get a clickbait mapper which locates it at a cluster of a 3-4 houses wedged at the end of a valley, clearly not consonant with the textual accounts. If someone could actually read the 1999 census it would help a good deal, but at the moment, given the sourcing and inconsistencies, I just cannot believe the text that we have now, and would suggest that starting over would be better than trying to work with what's there now.
Mangoe (
talk)
14:26, 10 September 2020 (UTC)reply
This appears to be a very poor latinization of a Pakistani language word. I can't find anything
around Timegara that resembles this name so I'm leaning towards delete without prejudice for recreation if this turns out to be a legitimate population center.
Oakshade (
talk) 21:42, 14 September 2020 (UTC) Changed to neutral based on Timothy's research below. If we could determine which population center this is for certain, then I'd say keep.
Oakshade (
talk)
02:27, 24 September 2020 (UTC)reply
KeepDraftify (changed vote, see below): I found a census that records two places with this name in LOWER DIR DISTRICT
here)) ). I'm not sure which one it is, I think its the one with 2564 population, (the other has 133 people) I think this accounts for
Mangoe discovery above. But whichever it is, it is a populated legally recognized place and appears to meet GEOLAND //
Timothy :: talk01:37, 24 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Changed my vote to Draftify.
Mackensen is right, if we're not sure what place it's referring to, then its not ready for mainspace.
BD2412 I think has the right compromise, if it can't be developed, it will be deleted, but it will have a chance to develop if possible. //
Timothy :: talk02:02, 25 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Move to draft, pending development of sources specifically indicating which entity by the name "Mian Banda" this is, and what its characteristics are.
BD2412T01:13, 25 September 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
What makes the nominator think that this village has no legal recognition? A click on the word "books" above shows that it is recognised by censuses.
Phil Bridger (
talk)
14:59, 31 August 2020 (UTC)reply
leaning delete There is certainly a Mian Banda in Pakistan, but I'm not the least convinced that it's anything like the place being talked about in this article. One set of references implies that it is on a substantial river; a news report recounts an address given at a seminary there with a name drop implying that everyone in Pakistan knows where it is. Meanwhile I get a clickbait mapper which locates it at a cluster of a 3-4 houses wedged at the end of a valley, clearly not consonant with the textual accounts. If someone could actually read the 1999 census it would help a good deal, but at the moment, given the sourcing and inconsistencies, I just cannot believe the text that we have now, and would suggest that starting over would be better than trying to work with what's there now.
Mangoe (
talk)
14:26, 10 September 2020 (UTC)reply
This appears to be a very poor latinization of a Pakistani language word. I can't find anything
around Timegara that resembles this name so I'm leaning towards delete without prejudice for recreation if this turns out to be a legitimate population center.
Oakshade (
talk) 21:42, 14 September 2020 (UTC) Changed to neutral based on Timothy's research below. If we could determine which population center this is for certain, then I'd say keep.
Oakshade (
talk)
02:27, 24 September 2020 (UTC)reply
KeepDraftify (changed vote, see below): I found a census that records two places with this name in LOWER DIR DISTRICT
here)) ). I'm not sure which one it is, I think its the one with 2564 population, (the other has 133 people) I think this accounts for
Mangoe discovery above. But whichever it is, it is a populated legally recognized place and appears to meet GEOLAND //
Timothy :: talk01:37, 24 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Changed my vote to Draftify.
Mackensen is right, if we're not sure what place it's referring to, then its not ready for mainspace.
BD2412 I think has the right compromise, if it can't be developed, it will be deleted, but it will have a chance to develop if possible. //
Timothy :: talk02:02, 25 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Move to draft, pending development of sources specifically indicating which entity by the name "Mian Banda" this is, and what its characteristics are.
BD2412T01:13, 25 September 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.