- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 05:06, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
Metacorder
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Metacorder ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
An online source search brings up no independent, reliable, significant coverage and an offline one brings up an unattributed Wikipedia fork. Therefore, I propose deletion as a WP:GNG failure. SITH (talk) 12:24, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz ( talk) 13:41, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz ( talk) 13:41, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz ( talk) 13:41, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. Based on the information in the article, this is a device in a non-notable short story by a non-notable writer? Unless something fairly central is missing, this is not encyclopedic material. / Julle ( talk) 14:03, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as non-notable. Wow, this article flew under the radar for a long time, didn't it? Colin M ( talk) 21:20, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per above. Aoba47 ( talk) 00:14, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 05:06, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
Metacorder
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Metacorder ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
An online source search brings up no independent, reliable, significant coverage and an offline one brings up an unattributed Wikipedia fork. Therefore, I propose deletion as a WP:GNG failure. SITH (talk) 12:24, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz ( talk) 13:41, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz ( talk) 13:41, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz ( talk) 13:41, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. Based on the information in the article, this is a device in a non-notable short story by a non-notable writer? Unless something fairly central is missing, this is not encyclopedic material. / Julle ( talk) 14:03, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as non-notable. Wow, this article flew under the radar for a long time, didn't it? Colin M ( talk) 21:20, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per above. Aoba47 ( talk) 00:14, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.