The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator, no one is arguing for deletion.
(non-admin closure) (
t ·
c) buidhe 10:52, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep Vexatious nomination. Passes WP:NACTOR. Actors are known for their work and this one had significant roles easily meeting the SNG. See
Historical Dictionary of African American Cinema,
The A to Z of African American Cinema, and
TV Guide. The nomination claims that the person has to pass SNG and GNG, however that is not what our guideline states
WP:NA topic is presumed to merit an article if: It meets either the general notability guideline below, or the criteria outlined in a subject-specific guideline listed in the box on the right; and It is not excluded under the What Wikipedia is not policy.Lightburst (
talk) 22:19, 4 October 2020 (UTC)reply
KeepWP:NOTABILITY is quite clear, they must passed either the general notability guidelines, or a subject specific guideline. If the nominator admits they pass the subject specific guideline for actors, then this is a bad nomination. After you read the short bit for BASIC you should've read the following bit for other ways they can be "presumed" notable.
DreamFocus 23:01, 4 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep: The nominator acknowledges that he passes NACTOR. —
Toughpigs (
talk) 23:21, 4 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep. It only needs to pass
WP:NACTOR. Does not need to pass
WP:BASIC as well as mentioned in
WP:N.
Pamzeis (
talk) 23:28, 4 October 2020 (UTC)reply
In that case, I withdraw this nomination. I assumed a BLP article had to pass
WP:BASIC.
Hitcher vs. Candyman (
talk) 23:35, 4 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep, per all of the above, notability established.
Gleeanon409 (
talk) 04:51, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep, per all of the above, notability established. 7&6=thirteen (
☎) 11:32, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator, no one is arguing for deletion.
(non-admin closure) (
t ·
c) buidhe 10:52, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep Vexatious nomination. Passes WP:NACTOR. Actors are known for their work and this one had significant roles easily meeting the SNG. See
Historical Dictionary of African American Cinema,
The A to Z of African American Cinema, and
TV Guide. The nomination claims that the person has to pass SNG and GNG, however that is not what our guideline states
WP:NA topic is presumed to merit an article if: It meets either the general notability guideline below, or the criteria outlined in a subject-specific guideline listed in the box on the right; and It is not excluded under the What Wikipedia is not policy.Lightburst (
talk) 22:19, 4 October 2020 (UTC)reply
KeepWP:NOTABILITY is quite clear, they must passed either the general notability guidelines, or a subject specific guideline. If the nominator admits they pass the subject specific guideline for actors, then this is a bad nomination. After you read the short bit for BASIC you should've read the following bit for other ways they can be "presumed" notable.
DreamFocus 23:01, 4 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep: The nominator acknowledges that he passes NACTOR. —
Toughpigs (
talk) 23:21, 4 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep. It only needs to pass
WP:NACTOR. Does not need to pass
WP:BASIC as well as mentioned in
WP:N.
Pamzeis (
talk) 23:28, 4 October 2020 (UTC)reply
In that case, I withdraw this nomination. I assumed a BLP article had to pass
WP:BASIC.
Hitcher vs. Candyman (
talk) 23:35, 4 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep, per all of the above, notability established.
Gleeanon409 (
talk) 04:51, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep, per all of the above, notability established. 7&6=thirteen (
☎) 11:32, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.