The result was keep. After reviewing this and the previous 2 discussions, it appears that consensus hasn't changed ( non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman ( talk) 02:24, 6 May 2009 (UTC) reply
This might be a tough one, but I don't see established notability. Subject is a Philadelphia ophthalmologist and 2x unsuccessful candidate for Congress, neither of which are enough to establish notability. So, per WP:BIO there must be published, independent, and reliable secondary source material published about the subject. There are some such articles, but they are all pretty weak and in the context of the subject's failed political candidacy, and thus, per WP:BIO not enough in of themselves enough to establish notability. -- A. Gorilla ( talk) 01:39, 23 April 2009 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. After reviewing this and the previous 2 discussions, it appears that consensus hasn't changed ( non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman ( talk) 02:24, 6 May 2009 (UTC) reply
This might be a tough one, but I don't see established notability. Subject is a Philadelphia ophthalmologist and 2x unsuccessful candidate for Congress, neither of which are enough to establish notability. So, per WP:BIO there must be published, independent, and reliable secondary source material published about the subject. There are some such articles, but they are all pretty weak and in the context of the subject's failed political candidacy, and thus, per WP:BIO not enough in of themselves enough to establish notability. -- A. Gorilla ( talk) 01:39, 23 April 2009 (UTC) reply