The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The subject of the article is only mentioned in one source, the Clementine Recognitions (
10.21), which gives them the briefest of mentions ("and Melera") in a list. The source is clearly anti-pagan, the mention being part of a "black catalogue" of Jupiter's affairs. There exist no secondary sources (to my knowledge) which mention such a figure, and so the article fails
WP:GNG.
Michael Aurel (
talk)
09:09, 14 June 2023 (UTC)reply
In this case, a redirect is essentially the same as a merge into Pandora (daughter of Deucalion), since the only essential fact and all three cited sources are already there. So do that: it's consistent with inclusionism, and that way nothing useful will be lost.
P Aculeius (
talk)
13:22, 14 June 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The subject of the article is only mentioned in one source, the Clementine Recognitions (
10.21), which gives them the briefest of mentions ("and Melera") in a list. The source is clearly anti-pagan, the mention being part of a "black catalogue" of Jupiter's affairs. There exist no secondary sources (to my knowledge) which mention such a figure, and so the article fails
WP:GNG.
Michael Aurel (
talk)
09:09, 14 June 2023 (UTC)reply
In this case, a redirect is essentially the same as a merge into Pandora (daughter of Deucalion), since the only essential fact and all three cited sources are already there. So do that: it's consistent with inclusionism, and that way nothing useful will be lost.
P Aculeius (
talk)
13:22, 14 June 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.