From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:19, 12 May 2017 (UTC) reply

Melbourne Murugan Temple

Melbourne Murugan Temple (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG relies solely on primary sources. No independent verifiable references which establishes its notability. Dan arndt ( talk) 08:28, 19 April 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt ( talk) 08:29, 19 April 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt ( talk) 08:29, 19 April 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:19, 19 April 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh ( talk) 00:56, 27 April 2017 (UTC) reply
  • delete the sources merely confirm it exists. no evidence of significant third party coverage. LibStar ( talk) 01:49, 28 April 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 05:54, 4 May 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Concur with nom. No notability. Searching does not turn up much beyond the primary sources in the article. MB 19:18, 4 May 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Weak Delete This page refers to a single congregation, not a more general religious group. I don't foresee any architectural claims of notability. Power~enwiki ( talk) 23:47, 10 May 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:19, 12 May 2017 (UTC) reply

Melbourne Murugan Temple

Melbourne Murugan Temple (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG relies solely on primary sources. No independent verifiable references which establishes its notability. Dan arndt ( talk) 08:28, 19 April 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt ( talk) 08:29, 19 April 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt ( talk) 08:29, 19 April 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:19, 19 April 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh ( talk) 00:56, 27 April 2017 (UTC) reply
  • delete the sources merely confirm it exists. no evidence of significant third party coverage. LibStar ( talk) 01:49, 28 April 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 05:54, 4 May 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Concur with nom. No notability. Searching does not turn up much beyond the primary sources in the article. MB 19:18, 4 May 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Weak Delete This page refers to a single congregation, not a more general religious group. I don't foresee any architectural claims of notability. Power~enwiki ( talk) 23:47, 10 May 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook