The result was keep. MBisanz talk 00:39, 8 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This has already failed four three AFDs in the past. I believe this is worthy of
WP:CSD#G4, but I'm going to give the most recent creator the benefit of the doubt and bring it here instead.
Dweller makes the point that this is
WP:V, and I agree that it is. It is well written, referenced, and interesting. But, it's still a dictdecf, and dictdefs belong in wictionary, where an entry already exists. --
RoySmith
(talk) 16:44, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
reply
Although articles should begin with a good definition and description of one topic, they should provide other types of information about that topic as well. Articles that contain nothing more than a definition should be expanded with additional encyclopedic content, if possible.
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 00:39, 8 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This has already failed four three AFDs in the past. I believe this is worthy of
WP:CSD#G4, but I'm going to give the most recent creator the benefit of the doubt and bring it here instead.
Dweller makes the point that this is
WP:V, and I agree that it is. It is well written, referenced, and interesting. But, it's still a dictdecf, and dictdefs belong in wictionary, where an entry already exists. --
RoySmith
(talk) 16:44, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
reply
Although articles should begin with a good definition and description of one topic, they should provide other types of information about that topic as well. Articles that contain nothing more than a definition should be expanded with additional encyclopedic content, if possible.