The result was no consensus. There is no real consensus at this time. As Robert particularly objected to the referencing which has been improved (albeit scarcely), and there has been no real discussion of the subject's actual notability, it is difficult to action a delete. The lack of participation may be down to a lack of real case being made for Meghan not meeting the notability criteria, and hopefully any relisting can explain the grounds for this side of the nomination more thoroughly. KaisaL ( talk) 02:53, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
The references do not appear to be independent and reliable, and this article appears to have too much focus on family rather than career. If additional references about his career can be found in seven days, Keep. Robert McClenon ( talk) 15:50, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Keep issues related for deletion of the article has been solved. Pls inform for any issue left. Do not delete. Iamnewtowiki ( talk) 23:42, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. There is no real consensus at this time. As Robert particularly objected to the referencing which has been improved (albeit scarcely), and there has been no real discussion of the subject's actual notability, it is difficult to action a delete. The lack of participation may be down to a lack of real case being made for Meghan not meeting the notability criteria, and hopefully any relisting can explain the grounds for this side of the nomination more thoroughly. KaisaL ( talk) 02:53, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
The references do not appear to be independent and reliable, and this article appears to have too much focus on family rather than career. If additional references about his career can be found in seven days, Keep. Robert McClenon ( talk) 15:50, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Keep issues related for deletion of the article has been solved. Pls inform for any issue left. Do not delete. Iamnewtowiki ( talk) 23:42, 22 June 2016 (UTC)