The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment Yes it does. You need to familiarise yourself with
WP:PORNBIO. If you want to check the "major" awards, WP have a whole articles on the
AVN Awards (including one for each of the 36 or so,
36th AVN Awards), which helpfully list out the "major awards" for you - one of which is "Best new starlet".
Britishfinance (
talk)
19:54, 22 February 2019 (UTC)reply
Solid Keep. She meets
WP:PORNBIO ("The person has won a well-known and significant industry award"). @
Spartaz: You need to familiarise yourself with
WP:PORNBIO before making further nominations. You have nominated a whole series of actors with AVN Awards who are all automatic Keeps. These people do not often screen well on quality RS for GNG for obvious reasons, hence
WP:PORNBIO.
Britishfinance (
talk)
02:16, 18 February 2019 (UTC)reply
Comment. You can find the list of "major" AVN awards in WP here (
36th AVN Awards), and it lists Best New Starlet as a "major award". We need to stick to WP:PAG and WP:PORNBIO here, and somebody's personal view on these actresses (which I know are contraversial), "contrived" outside of these PAGs.
Britishfinance (
talk)
19:50, 22 February 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete if you have to rely on PORNBIO because good sourcing is not available then the point is missed. Needs to meet GNG and
WP:ENT which this person does not.
Legacypac (
talk)
18:17, 24 February 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete: a BLP that lacks sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail. Fails
WP:BASIC. Best New Starlet does not even meet the (more or less discredited) PORNBIO, as the article on it has been deleted for lack of notability.
K.e.coffman (
talk)
19:41, 24 February 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment Yes it does. You need to familiarise yourself with
WP:PORNBIO. If you want to check the "major" awards, WP have a whole articles on the
AVN Awards (including one for each of the 36 or so,
36th AVN Awards), which helpfully list out the "major awards" for you - one of which is "Best new starlet".
Britishfinance (
talk)
19:54, 22 February 2019 (UTC)reply
Solid Keep. She meets
WP:PORNBIO ("The person has won a well-known and significant industry award"). @
Spartaz: You need to familiarise yourself with
WP:PORNBIO before making further nominations. You have nominated a whole series of actors with AVN Awards who are all automatic Keeps. These people do not often screen well on quality RS for GNG for obvious reasons, hence
WP:PORNBIO.
Britishfinance (
talk)
02:16, 18 February 2019 (UTC)reply
Comment. You can find the list of "major" AVN awards in WP here (
36th AVN Awards), and it lists Best New Starlet as a "major award". We need to stick to WP:PAG and WP:PORNBIO here, and somebody's personal view on these actresses (which I know are contraversial), "contrived" outside of these PAGs.
Britishfinance (
talk)
19:50, 22 February 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete if you have to rely on PORNBIO because good sourcing is not available then the point is missed. Needs to meet GNG and
WP:ENT which this person does not.
Legacypac (
talk)
18:17, 24 February 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete: a BLP that lacks sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail. Fails
WP:BASIC. Best New Starlet does not even meet the (more or less discredited) PORNBIO, as the article on it has been deleted for lack of notability.
K.e.coffman (
talk)
19:41, 24 February 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.