The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Merge to highway per Spinningpark. Bridges are not automatically entitled to Wikipedia articles just because they exist — for a bridge to qualify for a Wikipedia article, there needs to be some
reliably sourced political or social or historical context for what makes the bridge distinctive. But with the only source here being a
routine directory entry in an indiscriminate database of structures, that isn't the kind of sourcing we require to make the bridge notable.
Bearcat (
talk)
18:09, 11 June 2018 (UTC)reply
Merge per above. No evidence this particular bridge meets notability guidelines, but it is a plausible search term so I think a merge is the best option here. ~EDDY(
talk/
contribs)~
00:57, 15 June 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Merge to highway per Spinningpark. Bridges are not automatically entitled to Wikipedia articles just because they exist — for a bridge to qualify for a Wikipedia article, there needs to be some
reliably sourced political or social or historical context for what makes the bridge distinctive. But with the only source here being a
routine directory entry in an indiscriminate database of structures, that isn't the kind of sourcing we require to make the bridge notable.
Bearcat (
talk)
18:09, 11 June 2018 (UTC)reply
Merge per above. No evidence this particular bridge meets notability guidelines, but it is a plausible search term so I think a merge is the best option here. ~EDDY(
talk/
contribs)~
00:57, 15 June 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.