The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
A university soccer field is generally not notable, and I'm not seeing any indications that this should be an exception. A
WP:BEFORE search turns up no evidence of independent coverage about the facility. {{u|Sdkb}}talk22:39, 9 October 2021 (UTC)reply
That's an option, but I'm not sure this title as a redirect would get enough hits to justify the minor clutter of a hatnote. {{u|Sdkb}}talk18:51, 10 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete. There doesn't appear to be any SIGCOV but I would happily reconsider if the location should have any non-sport notability, as can be the case. Not at all sure it's worth a redirect.
No Great Shaker (
talk)
12:19, 13 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Redirect – as per GS, to
USC Trojans. There's a lot of passing mentions for "McAlister Field" or "Sony McAlister Field", and coupled with a not-insignificant number of page views in the past 30 days this suggests that this would profile as a possible search term.
Keskkonnakaitse (
talk)
04:41, 14 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete - outside of the websites for organisations directly connected with these facilities, there is very little coverage. Passing mentions in match reports do not count towards notability.
Spiderone(Talk to Spider)18:13, 18 October 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
A university soccer field is generally not notable, and I'm not seeing any indications that this should be an exception. A
WP:BEFORE search turns up no evidence of independent coverage about the facility. {{u|Sdkb}}talk22:39, 9 October 2021 (UTC)reply
That's an option, but I'm not sure this title as a redirect would get enough hits to justify the minor clutter of a hatnote. {{u|Sdkb}}talk18:51, 10 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete. There doesn't appear to be any SIGCOV but I would happily reconsider if the location should have any non-sport notability, as can be the case. Not at all sure it's worth a redirect.
No Great Shaker (
talk)
12:19, 13 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Redirect – as per GS, to
USC Trojans. There's a lot of passing mentions for "McAlister Field" or "Sony McAlister Field", and coupled with a not-insignificant number of page views in the past 30 days this suggests that this would profile as a possible search term.
Keskkonnakaitse (
talk)
04:41, 14 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete - outside of the websites for organisations directly connected with these facilities, there is very little coverage. Passing mentions in match reports do not count towards notability.
Spiderone(Talk to Spider)18:13, 18 October 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.