- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Per WP:SPEEDYKEEP#1. The nominator has withdrawn their nomination and there are no other arguments for deletion. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 15:01, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Matthias Finger ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I couldn't establish that he meets
WP:PROF or
WP:GNG, or that there is a good
WP:ATD.
Boleyn (
talk)
17:20, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, France, and Switzerland. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:10, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Question to nominator. There appear to be fairly large citations to books and papers. Does the nom think these do not contribute to notability?
Xxanthippe (
talk)
21:51, 24 January 2024 (UTC).
- The Google Scholar profile that was linked seems to be worse than useless: it includes some irrelevant publications and none of the significant ones. I removed it. Instead, to find the high-citation works, one should search author:matthias-finger — David Eppstein ( talk) 00:18, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks: when this new search is done [1] does the nominator think that it has any bearing on notability? Xxanthippe ( talk) 00:23, 25 January 2024 (UTC).
- Keep - he is a prominent and prolific researcher whose publications are impactful enough to meet WP:PROF, as I read it. Llajwa ( talk) 21:49, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. In case it is not obvious I support Keep on the basis of a pass of WP:Prof#C1 at least. Xxanthippe ( talk) 23:53, 25 January 2024 (UTC).
- Withdraw nomination per excellent points above. Thanks everyone.
Boleyn (
talk)
09:17, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- @
Boleyn, you need to close this as explained here.
Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion#Procedure_for_non-administrator_close_(nominator_withdrawal).
LibStar (
talk)
03:16, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Cut Bolyn some slack! They are working their butt off processing these articles. Llajwa ( talk) 17:24, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- @
Boleyn, you need to close this as explained here.
Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion#Procedure_for_non-administrator_close_(nominator_withdrawal).
LibStar (
talk)
03:16, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Per WP:SPEEDYKEEP#1. The nominator has withdrawn their nomination and there are no other arguments for deletion. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 15:01, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Matthias Finger ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I couldn't establish that he meets
WP:PROF or
WP:GNG, or that there is a good
WP:ATD.
Boleyn (
talk)
17:20, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, France, and Switzerland. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:10, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Question to nominator. There appear to be fairly large citations to books and papers. Does the nom think these do not contribute to notability?
Xxanthippe (
talk)
21:51, 24 January 2024 (UTC).
- The Google Scholar profile that was linked seems to be worse than useless: it includes some irrelevant publications and none of the significant ones. I removed it. Instead, to find the high-citation works, one should search author:matthias-finger — David Eppstein ( talk) 00:18, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks: when this new search is done [1] does the nominator think that it has any bearing on notability? Xxanthippe ( talk) 00:23, 25 January 2024 (UTC).
- Keep - he is a prominent and prolific researcher whose publications are impactful enough to meet WP:PROF, as I read it. Llajwa ( talk) 21:49, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. In case it is not obvious I support Keep on the basis of a pass of WP:Prof#C1 at least. Xxanthippe ( talk) 23:53, 25 January 2024 (UTC).
- Withdraw nomination per excellent points above. Thanks everyone.
Boleyn (
talk)
09:17, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- @
Boleyn, you need to close this as explained here.
Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion#Procedure_for_non-administrator_close_(nominator_withdrawal).
LibStar (
talk)
03:16, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Cut Bolyn some slack! They are working their butt off processing these articles. Llajwa ( talk) 17:24, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- @
Boleyn, you need to close this as explained here.
Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion#Procedure_for_non-administrator_close_(nominator_withdrawal).
LibStar (
talk)
03:16, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.