The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Context of this article is unverifiable OR while the cited source supports the dictionary definition of the term, not the philosophical context of it. Atsme📞📧 00:19, 6 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete We have a WIkipedisIsNot policy, but I cannot remember it's name. Its a pretty uncommon word, which is why I remember it exists.
L3X1(distænt write))evidence( 01:43, 14 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Its not in a past AfD I thought it be at, and I cannot find another AfD where it was used. If anyone knows it please ping me and enlighten me.
L3X1(distænt write))evidence( 01:53, 14 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Lankiveil(
speak to me) 11:02, 14 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947(
c) (
m) 04:32, 22 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete, a mixture of dicdef and apparent OR. Sandstein 14:08, 30 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete - no info on the cultural significance or history of the term - just its usage. I think
WP:NEO applies also., per
L3X1's comment above.
TimTempleton(talk)(cont) 19:29, 30 August 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Context of this article is unverifiable OR while the cited source supports the dictionary definition of the term, not the philosophical context of it. Atsme📞📧 00:19, 6 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete We have a WIkipedisIsNot policy, but I cannot remember it's name. Its a pretty uncommon word, which is why I remember it exists.
L3X1(distænt write))evidence( 01:43, 14 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Its not in a past AfD I thought it be at, and I cannot find another AfD where it was used. If anyone knows it please ping me and enlighten me.
L3X1(distænt write))evidence( 01:53, 14 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Lankiveil(
speak to me) 11:02, 14 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947(
c) (
m) 04:32, 22 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete, a mixture of dicdef and apparent OR. Sandstein 14:08, 30 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete - no info on the cultural significance or history of the term - just its usage. I think
WP:NEO applies also., per
L3X1's comment above.
TimTempleton(talk)(cont) 19:29, 30 August 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.