The result was close as no longer current, article was merged to Gyūhi without objection. Sandstein 10:05, 29 July 2007 (UTC) reply
WP:NN Not just a non-notable article (which isn't so harmful by itself IMO) but also unsourced, very unreliable and possibly misleading one.
It looks like Japanese sweets named as 'Matsunoyuki' are not only one, but several different kinds of wagashi are of the same name (just google it if you understand Japanese); so the name doesn't even specify its category, while the current article shows just one and it is wrong.
And, if you can list the Japanese sweets named Matsunoyuki, the article might possibly be something decent, but it looks like no one's interested to maintain the article, at least more than a year, and I think the fact suggests that it simply is not worthy. Darksider 01:20, 24 July 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was close as no longer current, article was merged to Gyūhi without objection. Sandstein 10:05, 29 July 2007 (UTC) reply
WP:NN Not just a non-notable article (which isn't so harmful by itself IMO) but also unsourced, very unreliable and possibly misleading one.
It looks like Japanese sweets named as 'Matsunoyuki' are not only one, but several different kinds of wagashi are of the same name (just google it if you understand Japanese); so the name doesn't even specify its category, while the current article shows just one and it is wrong.
And, if you can list the Japanese sweets named Matsunoyuki, the article might possibly be something decent, but it looks like no one's interested to maintain the article, at least more than a year, and I think the fact suggests that it simply is not worthy. Darksider 01:20, 24 July 2007 (UTC) reply