From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ~ Amatulić ( talk) 20:19, 11 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Matchday Live (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD contested by article creator, no reason given. Original deletion rationale remains valid - there is no evidence of notability. It's a "show" but the article is so poor you can't even tell if it's radio or TV...FYI it's radio but that's pretty much the only source I can find about it! Giant Snowman 09:18, 2 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 09:19, 2 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Keep: People who are saying they don't know whether if it's radio or TV, they can search the internet and add according to it rather than blaming the creator(which was me). If you want to know the Premier League produces the show before and after the live televised premier league games. I just added one article to such a vast Encyclopedia having thousands articles about various television shows. So I don't see any harm in keeping it. -- Sammanhumagain ( talk) 09:31, 2 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Delete – As per nominator, no evidence of notability, why should we have this article? I cant see any reason to keep it. You cant say that other articles exist as argument, WP:OTHERSTUFF. QED237  (talk) 11:50, 2 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:01, 3 November 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:02, 3 November 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:02, 3 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Delete: Not notable enough to have an article. I added a category, but still could not tell if it is a radio nor TV show. If readers have to "google" to find that answer, this article fails inclusion. — Wylie pedia 21:06, 3 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Delete - Absolutely no indication of notability. Fenix down ( talk) 16:42, 10 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Delete - Neither the creator or anyone else has added any references to show notability just stating (above) "they can search the internet" - if people are expected to have to search out the information for themselves no point in having the article that adds no real value. Most of the 'information' appears to be covered on John Dykes - would suggest the creator (or any other interested parties) add more on that page. KylieTastic ( talk) 18:22, 11 November 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ~ Amatulić ( talk) 20:19, 11 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Matchday Live (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD contested by article creator, no reason given. Original deletion rationale remains valid - there is no evidence of notability. It's a "show" but the article is so poor you can't even tell if it's radio or TV...FYI it's radio but that's pretty much the only source I can find about it! Giant Snowman 09:18, 2 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 09:19, 2 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Keep: People who are saying they don't know whether if it's radio or TV, they can search the internet and add according to it rather than blaming the creator(which was me). If you want to know the Premier League produces the show before and after the live televised premier league games. I just added one article to such a vast Encyclopedia having thousands articles about various television shows. So I don't see any harm in keeping it. -- Sammanhumagain ( talk) 09:31, 2 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Delete – As per nominator, no evidence of notability, why should we have this article? I cant see any reason to keep it. You cant say that other articles exist as argument, WP:OTHERSTUFF. QED237  (talk) 11:50, 2 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:01, 3 November 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:02, 3 November 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:02, 3 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Delete: Not notable enough to have an article. I added a category, but still could not tell if it is a radio nor TV show. If readers have to "google" to find that answer, this article fails inclusion. — Wylie pedia 21:06, 3 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Delete - Absolutely no indication of notability. Fenix down ( talk) 16:42, 10 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Delete - Neither the creator or anyone else has added any references to show notability just stating (above) "they can search the internet" - if people are expected to have to search out the information for themselves no point in having the article that adds no real value. Most of the 'information' appears to be covered on John Dykes - would suggest the creator (or any other interested parties) add more on that page. KylieTastic ( talk) 18:22, 11 November 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook