The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 17:35, 30 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep. Basing my comment on not paper; this is the sort of article that expands our coverage of areas better than a paper encyclopedia would. It should be thought of as appended to
Marvel Toys. It's quite a tidy, informative article, certainly not subject to the excesses of some.
HidingT 15:01, 22 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep - It takes some effort to sift out the retailer websites, but there are enough reliable sources providing
news and
reviews for this toyline to demonstrate notability.
Argento Surfer (
talk) 16:15, 22 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:32, 25 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Example of what? An article whose notability has been in question since 2012?
Argento Surfer (
talk) 20:55, 25 August 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 17:35, 30 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep. Basing my comment on not paper; this is the sort of article that expands our coverage of areas better than a paper encyclopedia would. It should be thought of as appended to
Marvel Toys. It's quite a tidy, informative article, certainly not subject to the excesses of some.
HidingT 15:01, 22 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep - It takes some effort to sift out the retailer websites, but there are enough reliable sources providing
news and
reviews for this toyline to demonstrate notability.
Argento Surfer (
talk) 16:15, 22 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:32, 25 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Example of what? An article whose notability has been in question since 2012?
Argento Surfer (
talk) 20:55, 25 August 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.