The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Unreferenced and subject simply does not pass
WP:BIO. Looked up "Martin Furer" and "Martin Furer + computer scientist" and found 2 or 3 sources stating that "a pair of Australian mathematicians...", otherwise he's just an educator. I considered moving to draftspace, however I think it's futile if there are no reliable sources to help improve the page. shelovesneo (
talk)
04:32, 24 August 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep, enough highly cited publications
[1] to convince me of a pass of
WP:PROF#C1. The integer multiplication algorithm is the splashiest (e.g. reported in major mainstream media
[2]) but far from the only significant contribution. —
David Eppstein (
talk)
13:49, 24 August 2023 (UTC)reply
Draftify. This is a new article and appears to be in good faith, let's give it a chance to breathe before deleting. Professors have several paths to notability. If not draftify, I lean weak keep because we have some signal pointing toward
WP:ACADEMIC -- decent citation counts per Google Scholar
[3], especially on
[4] and
[5]. —
siroχo16:06, 24 August 2023 (UTC)reply
weak Keep, decent GS profile for his field, with 7 publication that have 100+ citations this should be good enough to pass
WP:PROF#1 even though its a close call. --
hroest18:18, 25 August 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Unreferenced and subject simply does not pass
WP:BIO. Looked up "Martin Furer" and "Martin Furer + computer scientist" and found 2 or 3 sources stating that "a pair of Australian mathematicians...", otherwise he's just an educator. I considered moving to draftspace, however I think it's futile if there are no reliable sources to help improve the page. shelovesneo (
talk)
04:32, 24 August 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep, enough highly cited publications
[1] to convince me of a pass of
WP:PROF#C1. The integer multiplication algorithm is the splashiest (e.g. reported in major mainstream media
[2]) but far from the only significant contribution. —
David Eppstein (
talk)
13:49, 24 August 2023 (UTC)reply
Draftify. This is a new article and appears to be in good faith, let's give it a chance to breathe before deleting. Professors have several paths to notability. If not draftify, I lean weak keep because we have some signal pointing toward
WP:ACADEMIC -- decent citation counts per Google Scholar
[3], especially on
[4] and
[5]. —
siroχo16:06, 24 August 2023 (UTC)reply
weak Keep, decent GS profile for his field, with 7 publication that have 100+ citations this should be good enough to pass
WP:PROF#1 even though its a close call. --
hroest18:18, 25 August 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.