The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Those articles are not comparable to the one up for deletion. The former contain "information" whereas the later is solely numerical data. --
Alan Liefting (
talk -
contribs) 18:11, 26 February 2012 (UTC)reply
Delete Unsourced and does not establish what exactly the article is supposed to be about for one, this type of information is not really suited for Wikipedia.
OSbornarfcontribs. 05:41, 28 February 2012 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Those articles are not comparable to the one up for deletion. The former contain "information" whereas the later is solely numerical data. --
Alan Liefting (
talk -
contribs) 18:11, 26 February 2012 (UTC)reply
Delete Unsourced and does not establish what exactly the article is supposed to be about for one, this type of information is not really suited for Wikipedia.
OSbornarfcontribs. 05:41, 28 February 2012 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.